#2016 CHEVROLET TRAX VS HONDA HR V DRIVERS#
#2016 CHEVROLET TRAX VS HONDA HR V MANUAL#
#2016 CHEVROLET TRAX VS HONDA HR V FULL#

Sustained full-throttle acceleration from low revs up a steep hill (perhaps at 70 km/h in fourth gear), can also coax slippage from a worn-out clutch. If the engine fails to stall as the clutch is fully released, it may require replacement. Do this by assessing the clutch action for smoothness, listening for any unwanted sounds while releasing the pedal slowly (in gear, and in neutral), or by having a technician assess the clutch if you’re not sure how.įurther, consider coaxing slippage from a worn clutch by putting the vehicle in first gear, and fully releasing the clutch as slowly as possible, perhaps over a span of about 15 seconds. Is the clutch in the manual-equipped HR-V you’re considering in decent shape, or has it been burnt out by a previous driver? For best results, assume the clutch needs replacing, until you confirm otherwise. Other gripes include some quirky design elements that aren’t everyone’s bag of chips, and limited front passenger leg and foot space. Some owners dislike the HR-V’s square cupholders, which work nicely in Narnia, but not so well in the real world where beverages are served in cylindrical vessels.

#2016 CHEVROLET TRAX VS HONDA HR V MANUAL#

Owners report a good, sturdy ride that’s comfortable and feels durable on rougher roads, a sporty steering feel, a sporty gearshift feel on models with the manual transmission, excellent mileage, and plenty of space and flexibility for easy adaptation to virtually any job.

This system is a favourite amongst many owners, who use it as a visual aid to help achieve the best possible fuel economy.

#2016 CHEVROLET TRAX VS HONDA HR V DRIVERS#

Honda’s Eco Assist feature was included, and used illuminated trim rings around the instruments that turn green when drivers are operating the HR-V in the most fuel-efficient manner possible. The HR-V’s manual transmission was only available in front-drive models. EnginesĪvailable in front- or all-wheel drive (AWD), and in trims including LX, EX, and EX-L Navi, all units came powered by a 1.8-litre four-cylinder i-VTEC engine with 141 horsepower.

#2016 CHEVROLET TRAX VS HONDA HR V FULL#

Utilizing a centre-mounted fuel tank for increased cargo space and optimal interior packaging, HR-V offered up a tremendous 1,665 litres of cargo volume with the second-row seats folded down.įeature content included a space-saving push-button parking brake, Honda’s LaneWatch camera, a “Magic Seat” rear seating setup with seats that fold up or down, automatic lights and wipers, a back-up camera, and full multimedia connectivity.Ĭompetitor test drives may include the Nissan Juke, Chevrolet Trax, Mazda CX-3, Jeep Renegade, and others. Combining sporty styling with coupe-like visual accents, Honda’s expertise at interior packaging for exceptional on-board storage, and numerous driveline and trim-grade options, this model originally hit dealer lots with pricing from under $21,000. The Honda HR-V launched in 2015, giving the popular CR-V crossover a little brother in the automaker’s utility vehicle lineup.

2016 chevrolet trax vs honda hr v